Footnotes

United States v. Grizzard, 219 U.S. 180, 184-85 (1911); United States v. 57.09 Acres of Land in Skamania Cty. (Peterson I), 706 F.2d 280, 281 (9th Cir. 1983).

Va. Elec. , 365 U.S. at 630; see 68.94 Acres , 918 F.2d at 393 n.3; 38.60 Acres , 625 F.2d at 198 & n.1; Transwestern Pipeline , 418 F.2d at 21.

United States ex rel. Tenn. Valley Auth. v. Russell , 87 F. Supp. 386, 389 (E.D. Tenn. 1948).

Id. (citing Olson v. United States , 292 U.S. 246 (1934)); cf. Monongahela Nav. , 148 U.S. at 344 (existence of a reserved right in property may often materially affect value).

E.g. , United States v. 38.60 Acres of Land , 625 F.2d 196 (8th Cir. 1980); Transwestern Pipeline , 418 F.2d 15.

E.g. , Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. O’Brien , 418 F.2d 15, 21 (5th Cir. 1969); see United States v. 33.92356 Acres of Land (Piza-Blondet ), 585 F.3d 1, 4,

Similar easements are acquired to remove “danger trees” near high-voltage transmission lines, where they can present potentially serious hazards. See, e.g., Evans, 1991 WL 1113, at *2 n.2.

United States ex rel. Tenn. Valley Auth. v. Indian Creek Marble Co. , 40 F. Supp. 811, 821 (E.D. Tenn. 1941), cited with approval in United States v.

United States v. Causby , 328 U.S. 256, 268 (1946) (“Since . . . it is not clear whether the easement taken is a permanent or a temporary one, it would be premature for us to consider whether the amount of the award . . . was proper.”).

Evans v. Tenn. Valley Auth. , 922 F.2d 841, 1991 WL 1113, at *2 (6th Cir. 1991) (unpubl.) (discussing United States ex rel. Tenn. Valley Auth. v. An Easement & Right-of-Way , 182 F. Supp. 899 (M.D. Tenn. 1960)); cf. Monongahela Nav. Co. v. United States , 148 U.S. 312, 344 (1893) (“doubtless the existence of [a] reserved right to take the property upon certain specified terms may often, and perhaps in the present case, materially affect the question of value”).