Footnote 931
United States v. 320 Acres of Land , 605 F.2d 762, 798 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. 46,672.96 Acres of Land in Doña Ana Ctys. , 521 F.2d 13, 17
United States v. 320 Acres of Land , 605 F.2d 762, 798 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. 46,672.96 Acres of Land in Doña Ana Ctys. , 521 F.2d 13, 17
United States v. Pewee Coal Co. , 341 U.S. 114, 119 (1951) (Reed, J., concurring).
United States v. Banisadr Bldg. Joint Venture , 65 F.3d 374, 378 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. 883.89 Acres of Land in Sebastian Cty. , 442 F.2d 262, 265 (8th Cir. 1971), aff’g 314 F. Supp. 238 (W.D. Ark. 1970).
United States v. 131,675 Rentable Square Feet of Space (GSA-VA St. Louis I), No. 4:14-cv-1077, slip op. at *9, 2015 WL 4430134 (E.D. Mo. July 20, 2015) (citing Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 257 (1934)).
Id.
See, e.g., 883.89 Acres in Sebastian , 442 F.2d at 265.
See United States v. 131,675 Rentable Square Feet of Space (GSA-VA St. Louis I), No. 4:14-cv-1077, slip op. at *10, 2015 WL 4430134 (E.D. Mo. July 20, 2015) (condemned leasehold interest contained no option to renew, holdover, or terminate early); see also 883.89 Acres in Sebastian, 442 F.2d at 265 (valuation properly reflected no value for renewal options because “[t]here was no evidence . . . that these options had any value”); United States v. Right to Use & Occupy 3.38 Acres in Alexandria, 484 F.2d 1140, 1145 (4th Cir. 1973) (no evidence of any difference in value whether renewal option required 30 or 90 days’ notice to exercise).
E.g. , Banisadr , 65 F.3d at 378 (affirming finding that highest and best use of building was for regular office space at low-end rent based on detailed analysis of leases on several comparable buildings, rather than for specialized high-tech use, which lacked any supporting data).
See United States v. Gen. Motors Corp. , 323 U.S. 373, 382 (1945) (long-term rental value did not reflect market rental value of short-term occupancy of same space); see also 46,672.96 Acres in Doña Ana , 521 F.2d at 17 (“A further reason for rejecting the [proposed comparable] lease evidence is that these interests are dissimilar to the interest [being valued].”).
E.g., United States v. Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. , 339 U.S. 261 (1950); Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States , 338 U.S. 1 (1949); United States v. Petty Motor Co. , 327 U.S. 372 (1946); United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 323 U.S. 373 (1945); see Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 511, 519-520 (2012); United States v. 1735 N. Lynn St. , 676 F. Supp. 696-97 (E.D. Va. 1987); United States v. Flood Bldg. , 157 F. Supp. 438, 440-42
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.