Footnotes

See Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 511, 521 (2012) (“temporary limitations are subject to a more complex balancing process [than permanent occupations] to determine whether they are a taking” (quoting Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. , 458 U.S. 419, 435 n.12 (1982))).

Mont. Ry. Co. v. Warren , 137 U.S. 348, 352-53 (1890) (reiterated in ASARCO, Inc. v. Kadish , 490 U.S. 605, 628 n.3 (1989)); United States v. Consol.

Causby , 328 U.S. at 268.

See, e.g. , 767 Third Ave. Assocs. v. United States , 48 F.3d 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (affirming dismissal of alleged temporary physical and regulatory takings); First English , 482 U.S. 304 (alleged regulatory inverse taking).

Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United States (Otay Mesa I), 670 F.3d 1358, 1365 n.5 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting Wyatt v. United States, 271 F.3d 1090, 1097

See, e.g., Otay Mesa I, 670 F.3d 1358 (rejecting compensation award of approximately $3 million based on erroneous finding of temporary taking), and on remand, 110 Fed. Cl. 732 (2013) (Otay Mesa II) (awarding $455,520 based on finding of permanent taking), aff’d, 779 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (Otay Mesa III).

Ark. Game , 133 S. Ct. at 515.

See Bedford Assocs. , 548 F. Supp.at 743-45 (finding operating expenses borne by tenant must be deducted from expected rental income to lessor), modified in other respects , 713 F.2d 895 (2d Cir. 1983).

Id. at 701; United States v. 131,675 Rentable Square Feet of Space (GSA-VA St. Louis I), No. 4:14-cv-1077, slip op. at *8-*11, 2015 WL 4430134 (E.D. Mo. July 20, 2015). Damages are discussed in detail in Section 4.6.

1735 N. Lynn St., 676 F. Supp. at 698-99 (citing United States v. Miller , 317 U.S. 369, 376 (1943)).