See Ga.-Pac. Corp. v. United States , 640 F.2d 328, 361 n.44 (Ct. Cl. 1980) (per curiam) (“The concept of consequential damages, however, is sometimes troublesome and confusing in severance damage situations.”); see also eATon, supra note 16, at 289-90 (“[T]he term consequential damages introduces nothing but confusion to what, from a valuation standpoint, would merely appear [to] be a question of compensability.”).