See, e.g. , United States v. Miller , 317 U.S. 369, 376 (1943) (“loosely”); United States v. 9.20 Acres of Land in Polk Cty. , 638 F. 2d 1123, 1127 (8th Cir. 1981) (discussing “misleading nature of the term ‘severance damages’ as used in partial taking cases”); see United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. , 182 F.2d 172, 175 & n.1 (9th Cir. 1950) (“The use of this term is to be criticized because it is apt to lead to loose thinking.” (citing Miller , 317 U.S. at 376)); United States v. 760.807 Acres of Land in Honolulu , 731 F.2d 1443, 1448 (9th Cir. 1984).