Toronto, Hamilton, 338 U.S. at 402-405 (“Were market conditions normal, we could hardly call an award ‘just compensation’ unless relevant . . . sales, in available markets, were considered….The question is of course one of degree, and we do not mean to foreclose the consideration of each case upon its facts.”); see CSX Transp., Inc. v. Ga. State Bd. of Equalization, 552 U.S. 9, 17 (2007) (“Appraisers typically employ a combination of methods because no one approach is entirely accurate, at least in the absence of an established market for the type of property at issue. The individual methods yield sometimes more, sometimes less reliable results depending on the peculiar features of the property evaluated.”); Seravalli v. United States, 845 F.2d 1571, 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (“The method of valuation that is most appropriate in the light of the facts of the particular case may be a single method or some combination of different methods.”); Sill Corp. v. United