E.g., E. Tenn. Nat. Gas Co. v. 7.74 Acres of Land , 228 F. App’x 323 (4th Cir. 2007) (unpubl.) (highest and best use changed from commercial development before taking to agricultural or residential use after taking); Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. One Parcel of Land (OldGeorgetown), 691 F.2d 702, 703 (4th Cir. 1982) (change in intensity from low-density to high-density residential development in new mass- transit “impact zone”); United States v. Werner , 36 F.3d 1095 (4th Cir. 1994) (no change in highest and best use of large-lot residential development); 8.41 Acres in Orange , 680 F.2d at 394-95 (no change in highest and best use for industrial plant sites).