E.g., United States ex rel. Tenn. Valley Auth. v. 1.72 Acres of Land, 821 F.3d 742, 753 (6th Cir. 2016); L.E. Cooke , 991 F.2d at 341 (“In the absence of proof to the contrary, the current use is presumed to be the best use.”); 62.50 Acres in Jefferson, 953 F.2d at 890 (“A landowner can overcome this presumption only by showing a reasonable probability that the land is adaptable and needed for the potential use in the near future.”); Sand Mountain , 942 F.2d at 292; United States v. 158.24 Acres of Land in Bee Cty. , 515 F.2d 230, 233 (5th Cir. 1975).