1182 Brace v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 337, 352-53 (2006) (“the ipse dixit of that reliance does not make those facts, data or opinions true”), aff’d, 250 F. App’x 359 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (unpubl.) (“affirmed based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the trial court”); see, e.g., Granby I, 844 F. Supp. 2d at 676-81 (excluding all valuation and other evidence based on highest and best use that was premised on unreliable, unsupported opinions of subsidiary experts).1183 Granby I, 844 F. Supp. 2d at 676-81 (detailing failures of subsidiary experts’ opinions, holding such opinions were “without support” and excluding from consideration all valuation and other evidence based on unsupported subsidiary opinions); see also United States v. 1.604 Acres of Land (Granby III), 844 F. Supp. 2d 685, 689 (E.D. Va. 2011) (excluding opinions of five experts based on Granby I ruling).