1171 See Duncanville, 469 U.S. at 30 (“basic principles of indemnity embodied in the Just Compensation Clause”); Lutheran Synod, 441 U.S. at 517 (“‘basic equitable principles of fairness’ underlying the Just Compensation Clause” (quoting United States v. Fuller, 409 U.S. 488, 490)); see also Town of Clarksville v. United States, 198 F.2d 238, 242-43 (4th Cir. 1952) (“Of course, the interests of the public, upon which the payment burden rests, are at stake, too, and the award must not be in excess of strict equivalence.”).1172 Bos. Chamber of Commerce v. City of Boston, 217 U.S. 189, 195 (1910); see Brown, 263 U.S. at 83 (“A method of compensation by substitution would seem to be the best means of making the parties whole” in “peculiar” circumstances presented.); see also Duncanville, 469 U.S. at 37 (O’Connor, J., concurring) (“the make-whole remedy intended by the Just Compensation Clause”); Lutheran Synod, 441 U.S. at 511 (“compensation required to make the owner whole”), 516 (“The guiding principle of just compensation . . . is that the owner of the condemned property ‘must be made whole but is not entitled to more.’” (quoting Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255)).