Footnote 1126
1126 Fuller, 409 U.S. at 491-92. Congress has provided for administrative payments for losses due to cancellation of Taylor grazing permits for war purposes. See 43 U.S.C. § 315q (2012); United States v. Cox, 190 F.2d 293, 296 (10th Cir. 1951). But these administrative benefits created by statute are separate from compensation under the Fifth Amendment, and beyond the scope of the appraiser’s assignment to estimate market value. See United States v. Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co., 339 U.S. 261, 263-64, 264 n.2 (1950); United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 323 U.S. 373, 379- 80 (1945); United States v. Willow River Power Co., 324 U.S. 499, 510 (1945).“require suspension of the normal rules for determining just compensation.” 1127 Accordingly, compensation for streets, highways, roads, alleys, other infrastructure, or public facilities is measured by the same market value standard applied to other types of property, whether publicly or privately owned. “Deviation from this measure of just compensation [is] required only ‘when market value [is] too difficult to find, or when its application would result in manifest injustice to owner or public.’” 1128 Appraisals for federal acquisitions of streets, infrastructure, or public facilities must therefore follow the same valuation standards as for any other property, whether privately or publicly owned. 1129