1124 Id. at 491-92; see, e.g., Estate of Hage, 687 F.3d at 1291-92.1125 Hage v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 570, 587-88 (Fed. Cl. 2002); see Estate of Hage, 687 F.3d at 1291-92; see also Monongahela Nav. Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312, 327 (1893) (“The legislature may determine what . . . property is needed for public purposes[,]” but determining the measure of compensation “is a judicial, and not a legislative, question.”); Hage v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 147, 170 (Fed. Cl. 1996) (“[B]ased upon the language and history of the Granger-Thye Act and the Taylor Grazing Act, . . . Congress had no legislative intention of creating a property interest in the permit just as Congress had no legislative intention of creating a property interest in the underlying federal lands.”).