1012 Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 511, 522 (2012) (noting that bearing of Arkansas water-rights law on whether taking occurred should be addressed on remand).1013 See, e.g., United States v. 320 Acres of Land, 605 F.2d 762, 818-19 & n.128 (5th Cir. 1979) (legal framework affecting uses of property must be taken into account). Note that this is not an exception to the rule that federal, not state, law controls. Scott Lumber Co., 390 F.2d at 395-96 (rejecting valuation based on proposed highest and best use that violated state law); see Section 4.1.