Footnote 674
E.g., Miller, 317 U.S. at 370-73; United States v. Eastman (Eastman III), 714 F.2d 76 (9th Cir. 1983); United States v. 49.01 Acres of Land in Osage Cty., 669 F.2d 1364, 1366-69 (10th Cir. 1982); United States v. 62.17 Acres of Land in Jasper Cty., 538 F.2d 670, 678 (5th Cir. 1976) (“We cannot straitjacket the government in defining scope of the project, but on the other hand, we cannot permit global meanderings to enclave areas not reasonably to have been conceived as included at its inception.”); United States v. 172.80 Acres of Land in Mercer Cty., 350 F.2d 957 (3d Cir. 1965); United States v. Crance, 341 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1965).