E.g., Buhler, 305 F.2d at 328-29; see United States v. 25.202 Acres of Land (Amexx I), 860 F. Supp. 2d 165, 177-79 (N.D.N.Y. 2010) (“A potential use should be considered only to the extent that the prospect of demand for such use would have affected the price that a willing buyer would have offered for the property just prior to the taking.”), aff ’d, 502 F. App’x 43, 45 (2d Cir. 2012).